Talk:Pakistan–Singapore relations

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pakistan–Singapore relations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naval conflict

I think the whole subsection should be removed. It is really about China-Pakistan relations. LibStar (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its a multilateral issue (China, Pakistan, India, USA, and most importantly Singapore) in which Singapore PSA holds key-importance, as PSA is the key contractor of the Gwadar port. Pakistan and Singapore involvement in the Gwadar port is primary, whereas China, India and USA involvement holds secondary importance. (Jalal0 (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

the subsection I've tagged contains no comments from Singapore officials. The info is adequately covered in other articles. LibStar (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well in that case merge it with China-Pakistan relations article. (Jalal0 (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Merged done --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pakistan–Singapore relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]